Problems Of Successful Implementation

Problems of successful implementation centre around how well or badly the existing organization responds and how adequate its reporting proves to be.

According to Arthur A. Owen, in practice there are four problem areas associated with the successful implementation of strategies:

The first problem is that, although strategies need to be developed around the business units (SBUs), of the corporation, these units often do not correspond to parts of the organizations structure. Business units have an external market-place for goods and services, and their management can plan and execute strategies independent of other pieces of the company. Moreover, the organization structure - and how that functions - derives from its history of take-over, tax considerations, shareholders considerations, economies of scale, personnel strengths and weaknesses, national legal requirements, and so on. Therefore, at any time strategy and structure need to be matched and supportive of each other.

Strategic planners must attempt to cut through the culture of diversified corporation and to plan in relation to the various competitive environments by identifying the strategies for them.

Moreover, these strategies still have to be implemented by the organization as a whole.

A second problem area is that traditional management reports are not sensitive enough to monitor the implementation strategies, thus the strategic manager not fully aware of what is happening. Hence the performance of existing structure is not monitored properly, and as a result control mechanisms may be ineffective.

Third, implementing strategy involves change, which in turn involves uncertainty and risk. Therefore, motivating managers to make changes is a key determinant.

Finally, management systems (such as compensation schemes, management development, communications systems and so on) are often in place as a result of past strategies; they are rarely tuned or revised to meet the needs of new ones.

Alexander adds additional factors that are also significant:

  • the failure to predict the time and problems which implementation will involve;
  • other activities and commitments that distract attention and possibly cause resources to be diverted;
  • that the bases upon which the strategies were formulated change, or were forecast poorly and insufficient flexibility has been built in.

To counter these problems Owen suggests the following:

  • allocating clear responsibility and accountability for the success of the overall strategy project;
  • limiting the number of strategies pursued at any one time;
  • identifying actions to be taken to achieve the strategic objective, allocating detailed responsibilities for actions - and getting agreement for them;
  • identifying a lists of emilestonesl, or major intermediate progress points;
  • identifying key performance measures to be monitored throughout the life of the strategy project, and creating an information system to record progress.

Previous page Next page
The Nature Of Strategy Implementation
The information on this page may not be reproduced, republished or mirrored on another webpage or website.
Copyright 1998-2014